Copyright © 2020-2023 the Contributors to the YAML-LD Specification, published by the JSON for Linking Data Community Group under the W3C Community Contributor License Agreement (CLA) . A human-readable summary is available.
In
recent
years,
[
YAML
]
has
emerged
as
a
more
concise
format
to
represent
information
that
had
previously
been
serialized
as
JSON,
including
Linked
Data.
This
document
defines
how
to
serialize
linked
data
in
YAML.
Moreover,
it
registers
the
application/ld+yaml
media
type.
This specification was published by the JSON for Linking Data Community Group . It is not a W3C Standard nor is it on the W3C Standards Track. Please note that under the W3C Community Contributor License Agreement (CLA) there is a limited opt-out and other conditions apply. Learn more about W3C Community and Business Groups .
This document has been developed by the JSON-LD Community Group .
GitHub Issues are preferred for discussion of this specification. Alternatively, you can send comments to our mailing list. Please send them to public-linked-json@w3.org ( subscribe , archives ).
[ JSON-LD11 ] is a JSON-based format to serialize Linked Data. In recent years, [ YAML ] has emerged as a more concise format to represent information that had previously been serialized as [ JSON ], including API specifications, data schemas, and Linked Data.
This document defines YAML-LD as a set of conventions on top of YAML which specify how to serialize Linked Data [ LINKED-DATA ] as [ YAML ] based on JSON-LD syntax, semantics, and APIs.
Since YAML is more expressive than JSON, both in the available data types and in the document structure (see [ I-D.ietf-httpapi-yaml-mediatypes ]), this document identifies constraints on YAML such that any YAML-LD document can be represented in JSON-LD.
This section is non-normative.
To understand the basics of this specification, one must be familiar with the following:
This document is intended primarily for two main audiences, comprised of software developers and IT and non-IT professionals, as described below.
Among related technologies, JSON-LD familiarity would be required to build most YAML-LD capable applications, while RDF familiarity is only required when it is desired to convert YAML-LD to RDF graphs, or vice versa.
IT and non-IT professionals who want to read and/or produce Linked Data documents in YAML-LD format. Such documents can be —
For
these
users,
familiarity
with
JSON-LD
is
not
required,
but
understanding
of
Linked
Data
principles
might
be
beneficial.
The
YAML-LD
Primer
[
YAML-LD-PRIMER
]
is
meant
as
a
gentle
introduction
to
the
essential
information
necessary
to
use
YAML-LD
in
practice.
This section is non-normative.
This document uses the following terms as defined in external specifications and defines terms specific to JSON-LD.
A YAML-LD stream is a YAML stream of YAML-LD documents .
For interoperability considerations on YAML streams, see the relevant section in YAML Media Type .
A YAML-LD document is any YAML document from which a conversion to [ JSON ] produces a valid JSON-LD document which can be interpreted as [ LINKED-DATA ].
The term media type is imported from [ RFC6838 ].
The term JSON is imported from [ JSON ]
The term JSON document represents a serialization of a resource conforming to the [ JSON ] grammar.
The terms JSON-LD document , and value object are imported from [ JSON-LD11 ].
The terms internal representation , and documentLoader are imported from [ JSON-LD11-API ].
The terms array , boolean , map , map entry , null , and string are imported from [ INFRA ].
The term number is imported from [ ECMASCRIPT ].
The terms YAML , YAML representation graph , YAML stream , YAML directive , TAG directive , YAML document , YAML sequence (either block sequence or flow sequence ), YAML mapping (either block mapping or flow mapping ), node , scalar , node anchor , node tags , and alias node , are imported from [ YAML ].
The term content negotiation is imported from [ RFC9110 ].
The terms RDF literal , language-tagged string , datatype IRI , and language tag are imported from [ RDF11-CONCEPTS ].
The terms fragment and fragment identifier in this document are to be interpreted as in [ URI ].
The term Linked Data is imported from [ LINKED-DATA ].
This section is non-normative.
This specification makes use of the following namespace prefixes:
Prefix | IRI |
---|---|
ex | http://example.org/ |
i18n | https://www.w3.org/ns/i18n# |
rdf | http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# |
xsd | http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# |
These
are
used
within
this
document
as
part
of
a
compact
IRI
as
a
shorthand
for
the
resulting
IRI
,
such
as
dcterms:title
used
to
represent
http://purl.org/dc/terms/title
.
As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.
The key words MAY , MUST , MUST NOT , RECOMMENDED , and SHOULD in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [ RFC2119 ] [ RFC8174 ] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
A YAML-LD document complies with this specification if it follows the normative statements from this specification and can be interpreted as [ JSON-LD11 ] after transformation into the internal representation . For convenience, normative statements for documents are often phrased as statements on the properties of the document.
A YAML-LD document complies with the YAML-LD JSON profile of this specification if it follows the normative statements from this specification and can be transformed into a JSON-LD representation, then back to a conforming YAML-LD document, without loss of semantic information.
This section is non-normative.
To ease writing and collaborating on [ JSON-LD11 ] documents, it is becoming common practice to serialize them as [ YAML ]. This requires a registered media type, not only to enable content negotiation of linked data documents in YAML, but also to define the expected behavior of applications that process these documents, including fragment identifiers and interoperability considerations.
This is because YAML is more flexible than [ JSON ]:
The first goal of this specification is to allow a JSON-LD document to be processed and serialized into YAML, and then back into JSON-LD, without losing any semantic information.
This is always possible, because a YAML representation graph can always represent a tree, because JSON data types are a subset of YAML's, and because JSON encoding is UTF-8.
The subset of YAML-LD which supports serialisation of JSON-LD documents is defined as the YAML-LD JSON profile of YAML-LD.
Example: The JSON-LD document below
{
"@context": "https://json-ld.org/contexts/person.jsonld",
"name": "Joe Hacker",
"homepage": "https://example.org/joe.hacker/",
"image": "https://example.org/joe.hacker/image.png"
}
Can
be
serialized
as
YAML
as
follows.
Note
that
entries
starting
with
@
need
to
be
enclosed
in
quotes
(as
shown
in
this
example),
because
@
is
a
reserved
character
in
YAML.
%YAML 1.2
---
'@context': https://json-ld.org/contexts/person.jsonld
name: Joe Hacker
homepage: https://example.org/joe.hacker/
image:
https://example.org/joe.hacker/image.png
This
document
is
based
on
YAML
1.2.2,
but
YAML-LD
is
not
tied
to
a
specific
version
of
YAML.
Implementers
concerned
about
features
related
to
a
specific
YAML
version
can
specify
it
in
documents
using
the
%YAML
directive
(see
10.
6.
Interoperability
Considerations
).
A
YAML-LD
document
MUST
be
encoded
in
UTF-8,
to
ensure
interoperability
with
[
JSON
];
otherwise,
an
invalid-encoding
error
has
been
detected
and
processing
is
aborted.
Since anchor names are a serialization detail, such anchors MUST NOT be used to convey relevant information, MAY be altered when processing the document, and MAY be dropped when interpreting the document as JSON-LD.
Not sure how to test that anchors are not used to convey information. As the Internal Representation has does not have a way of expressing anchors, also not sure how to test for this.
A YAML-LD document MAY contain anchored nodes and alias nodes , but its representation graph MUST NOT contain cycles; otherwise, a loading-document-failed error has been detected and processing is aborted. When interpreting the document as JSON-LD, alias nodes MUST be resolved by value to their target nodes.
The
YAML-LD
document
in
the
following
example
contains
alias
nodes
for
the
{"@id":
"countries:ITA"}
object:
%YAML 1.2
---
"@context":
"@vocab": "http://schema.org/"
"countries": "http://publication.europa.eu/resource/authority/country/"
"@graph":
- &ITA
"@id": countries:ITA
- "@id": http://people.example/Homer
name: Homer Simpson
nationality: *ITA
- "@id": http://people.example/Lisa
name: Lisa Simpson
nationality:
*ITA
While the representation graph (and eventually the in-memory representation of the data structure, e.g., a Python dictionary or a Java hashmap) will still contain references between nodes, the JSON-LD serialization will not, as shown below:
{
"@context": {
"@vocab": "http://schema.org/",
"countries": "http://publication.europa.eu/resource/authority/country/"
},
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "countries:ITA"
},
{
"@id": "http://people.example/Homer",
"full_name": "Homer Simpson",
"country": {
"@id": "countries:ITA"
}
},
{
"@id": "http://people.example/Lisa",
"full_name": "Lisa Simpson",
"country": {
"@id": "countries:ITA"
}
}
]
}
Every YAML-LD file is a YAML-LD stream and might contain multiple YAML-LD documents , as shown in the example below.
"@id": ex:Ray
"@type": ex:Cat
name:
en: Ray
---
"@id": ex:Smoke
"@type": ex:Cat
name:
en:
Smoke
Each of the individual YAML documents in the stream is converted into a separate JSON-LD document and processed separately.
The
current
text
does
not
support
this,
and
only
supports
a
single
YAML
document
.
This
is
inconsistent
with
the
processing
description
in
5.1
D.1.1
Converting
a
YAML
stream
.
This section is non-normative.
See Security considerations in JSON-LD 1.1 . Also, see the YAML media type registration.
This section is non-normative.
For general interoperability considerations on the serialization of JSON documents in [ YAML ], see YAML and the Interoperability consideration of application/yaml [ I-D.ietf-httpapi-yaml-mediatypes ].
The YAML-LD format and the media type registration are not restricted to a specific version of YAML, but implementers that want to use YAML-LD with YAML versions other than 1.2.2 need to be aware that the considerations and analysis provided here, including interoperability and security considerations, are based on the YAML 1.2.2 specification.
This section has been submitted to the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) for review, approval, and registration with IANA.
This section describes the information required to register the above media type according to [ RFC6838 ]
profile
A
non-empty
list
of
space-separated
URIs
identifying
specific
constraints
or
conventions
that
apply
to
a
YAML-LD
document
according
to
[
RFC6906
].
A
profile
does
not
change
the
semantics
of
the
resource
representation
when
processed
without
profile
knowledge,
so
that
clients
both
with
and
without
knowledge
of
a
profiled
resource
can
safely
use
the
same
representation.
The
profile
parameter
MAY
be
used
by
clients
to
express
their
preferences
in
the
content
negotiation
process.
If
the
profile
parameter
is
given,
a
server
SHOULD
return
a
document
that
honors
the
profiles
in
the
list
which
it
recognizes,
and
MUST
ignore
the
profiles
in
the
list
which
it
does
not
recognize.
It
is
RECOMMENDED
that
profile
URIs
are
dereferenceable
and
provide
useful
documentation
at
that
URI.
For
more
information
and
background
please
refer
to
[
RFC6906
].
This
specification
allows
the
use
of
the
profile
parameters
listed
in
and
additionally
defines
the
following:
http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#extended
When
used
as
a
media
type
parameter
[
RFC4288
]
in
an
HTTP
Accept
header
field
[
RFC9110
],
the
value
of
the
profile
parameter
MUST
be
enclosed
in
quotes
(
"
)
if
it
contains
special
characters
such
as
whitespace,
which
is
required
when
multiple
profile
URIs
are
combined.
When processing the "profile" media type parameter, it is important to note that its value contains one or more URIs and not IRIs. In some cases it might therefore be necessary to convert between IRIs and URIs as specified in section 3 Relationship between IRIs and URIs of [ RFC3987 ].
This section is non-normative.
Fragment identifiers used with application/ld+yaml are treated as in RDF syntaxes, as per RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax [ RDF11-CONCEPTS ] and do not follow the process defined for application/yaml.
This section is non-normative.
FIXME
This section is non-normative.
REMOVE THIS SECTION BEFORE PUBLICATION.
While YAML-LD could define a specific predicate for comments, that is insufficient because, for example, the order of keywords is not preserved in JSON, so the comments could be displaced. This specification does not provide a means for preserving [ YAML ] comments after a JSON serialization.
# First comment
"@context": "http://schema.org"
# Second comment
givenName:
John
Transforming the above entry into a JSON-LD document results in:
{ "@context": "http://schema.org", "givenName": "John"
}
The above structures cannot be preserved when serializing to JSON-LD and - with respect to cycles - the serialization will fail.
Programming
languages
such
as
Java
and
Python
already
support
YAML
representation
graphs
,
but
these
implementations
may
behave
differently.
In
the
following
example,
&value
references
the
value
of
the
keyword
value
.
value: &value 100
valve1:
temperature: &temp100C
value: *value
unit: degC
valve2:
temperature:
*temp100C
Processing
this
entry
in
Python,
I
get
the
following
structure
that
preserve
the
references
to
mutable
objects
(e.g.,
the
temperature
dict)
but
not
to
scalars
(e.g.,
the
value
keyword).
temperature = { "value": 100, "unit": "degC" }
document = {
"value": 100,
"valve1": { "temperature": temperature },
"valve2": { "temperature": temperature }
}
Since all these implementations pre-date this specification, some more interoperable choices include the following:
This section is non-normative.
Here, we propose to YAML-LD users a bit of advice which, although optional, might suggest one or two useful thoughts.
…in order to achieve a greater level of reusability, performance, and human friendliness among YAML-LD aware systems. The [ json-ld-bp ] document is as relevant to YAML-LD as it is to [ JSON-LD11 ].
Instead, provide pre-built contexts that the user can reference by URL for a majority of common use cases.
YAML-LD is intended to simplify the authoring of Linked Data for a wide range of domain experts; its target audience is not comprised solely of IT professionals. [ YAML ] is chosen as a medium to minimize syntactic noise, and to keep the authored documents concise and clear. [ JSON-LD11 ] (and hence YAML-LD) Context comprises a special language of its own. A requirement to author such a context would make the domain expert's job much harder, which we, as system architects and developers, should try to avoid.
For
instance,
according
to
[
JSON-LD11-API
],
the
expand()
method
of
a
JSON-LD
processor
accepts
an
expandContext
argument
which
can
be
used
to
provide
a
default
system
context.
If
possible,
map
JSON-LD
keywords
containing
the
@
character
to
keywords
that
do
not
contain
it.
The
@
character
is
reserved
in
YAML,
and
thus
requires
quoting
(or
escaping),
as
in
the
following
example:
"@context":
- https://prefix.cc/context
- ex: https://example.org/
name:
"@id": rdfs:label
"@container": "@language"
"@id": ex:Ray
"@type": ex:Cat
name:
en: Ray
ua: Промiнчик
ru:
Лучик
The
need
to
quote
these
keywords
has
to
be
learnt,
and
introduces
one
more
little
irregularity
to
the
document
author's
life.
Further,
on
most
keyboard
layouts,
typing
quotes
will
require
Shift
,
which
reduces
typing
speed,
albeit
slightly.
In
order
to
avoid
this,
the
context
might
introduce
custom
mappings
for
the
necessary
keywords.
For
instance,
[
schema-org
]
context
redefines
@id
as
just
id
—
which
seems
to
be
much
more
convenient
to
type,
and
no
more
difficult
to
remember.
YAML-LD
users
may
use
a
JSON-LD
context
provided
as
part
of
this
specification,
henceforth
known
as
the
convenience
context
,
which
defines
a
standardized
mapping
of
every
@
-keyword
to
a
$
-keyword,
except
@context
.
The
convenience
context
contains
an
alias
to
every
JSON-LD
keyword
which
the
JSON-LD
1.1
specification
permits
aliasing
—
which
means
all
the
keywords
except
@context
.
The
reserved
@
character
is
replaced
by
$
,
which
is
not
reserved
and
therefore
does
not
require
quoting.
Consider
Example
10
reformatted
using
the
convenience
context
:
"@context":
- https://prefix.cc/context
- https://yaml-ld.dev/context
- ex: https://example.org/
name:
$id: rdfs:label
$container: $language
$id: ex:Ray
$type: ex:Cat
name:
en: Ray
ua: Промiнчик
ru:
Лучик
The applicability of this context depends on the domain and is left to the architect's best judgement.
This section is non-normative.
To take better advantage of the broader expressivity of YAML, this document also defines a means of extending the JSON-LD internal representation to allow a more complete expression of native data types within YAML-LD, and allows use of the complete JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API [ JSON-LD11-API ] Application Programming Interface to manipulate extended YAML-LD documents.
A YAML-LD document complies with the YAML-LD extended profile of this specification if it follows the normative statements from this specification and can be transformed into the JSON-LD extended internal representation , then back to a conforming YAML-LD document, without loss of semantic information.
As [ YAML ] has well-defined representation requirements, all YAML-LD streams MUST form a well-formed stream and use alias node defined by a previous node with a corresponding anchor ; otherwise, a loading-document-failed error has been detected and processing is aborted.
The YAML-LD extended profile allows full use of anchor names and alias nodes subject to the requirements described above in this section.
If
the
extendedYAML
API
flag
is
true
,
the
processing
result
will
be
in
the
extended
internal
representation
.
When
processing
using
the
YAML-LD
JSON
profile
,
documents
MUST
NOT
contain
alias
nodes
;
otherwise,
a
profile-error
error
has
been
detected
and
processing
is
aborted.
YAML-LD processing is defined by converting YAML to the internal representation and using JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API to process on that representation, after which the representation is converted back to YAML. As information specific to a given YAML document structure is lost in this transformation, much of the specifics of that original representation are therefore lost in that conversion, limiting the ability to fully round-trip a YAML-LD document back to an equivalent representation. Consequently, round-tripping in this context is limited to preservation of the semantic representation of a document, rather than a specific syntactic representation.
The conversion process represented here is compatible with the description of "Composing the Representation Graph" from the 3.1.2 Load section of [ YAML ]. The steps described below for converting to the internal representation operate upon that YAML Ain’t Markup Language (YAML™) version 1.2.2 .
When operating using the YAML-LD JSON profile , it is intended that the common feature provided by most YAML libraries of transforming YAML directly to JSON satisfies the requirements for parsing a YAML-LD file.
As a developer, I want to be able to convert JSON-LD documents to YAML-LD by simply serializing the document using any standard YAML library, So that the resulting YAML is valid YAML-LD, resolving to the same graph as the original JSON-LD.
A YAML stream is composed of zero or more YAML documents .
YAML streams may correspond more directly to JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Text Sequences , which are not presently part of the JSON-LD representation model. The description here more closely aligns with how JSON-LD interprets HTML Scripts .
Any error reported in a recursive processing step MUST result in the failure of this processing step.
From the YAML grammar , a YAML document MAY be preceded by a Document Prefix and/or a set of directives followed by a YAML bare document , which is composed of a single node .
Any error reported in a recursive processing step MUST result in the failure of this processing step.
Both block sequences and flow sequences are directly aligned with an array in the internal representation .
Any error reported in a recursive processing step MUST result in the failure of this processing step.
Both block mappings and flow mappings are directly aligned with a map in the internal representation .
mapping-key-error
error
has
been
detected
and
processing
MUST
be
aborted.
Any error reported in a recursive processing step MUST result in the failure of this processing step.
extendedYAML
flag
is
true
,
and
node
n
has
a
node
tag
t
,
n
is
mapped
as
follows:
tag:yaml.org.2002:
,
the
conversion
result
is
mapped
through
the
YAML
Core
Schema
.
https://www.w3.org/ns/i18n#
,
and
the
suffix
does
not
contain
an
underscore
(
"_"
),
the
conversion
result
is
a
language-tagged
string
with
value
taken
from
n
,
and
a
language
tag
taken
from
the
suffix
of
t
.
"_"
),
such
as
i18n:ar-eg_rtl
describe
a
combination
of
language
and
text
direction.
See
The
i18n
Namespace
in
[
JSON-LD11
].
Implementations may retain the representation as an YAML Integer , or YAML Floating Point , but a JSON-LD processor must treat them uniformly as a number , although the specific type of number value SHOULD be retained for round-tripping.
The conversion result is the value of the entry in the named nodes map having the node entry. If none exist, the document is invalid, and processing MUST end in failure.
If
an
alias
node
is
encountered
when
processing
the
YAML
representation
graph
and
the
extendedYAML
flag
is
false
,
the
YAML-LD
JSON
profile
has
been
selected.
A
profile-error
error
has
been
detected
and
processing
MUST
be
aborted.
If a cycle is detected, a processing error MUST be returned, and processing aborted.
The conversion process from the internal representation involves turning that representation back into a YAML representation graph and relies on the description of "Serializing the Representation Graph" from the 3.1.1 Dump section of [ YAML ] for the final serialization.
As the internal representation is rooted by either an array or a map , the process of transforming the internal representation to YAML begins by preparing an empty representation graph which will be rooted with either a YAML mapping or YAML sequence .
Although
outside
of
the
scope
of
this
specification,
processors
MAY
use
YAML
directives
,
including
TAG
directives
,
and
Document
markers
,
as
appropriate
for
best
results.
Specifically,
if
the
extendedYAML
API
flag
is
true
,
the
document
SHOULD
use
the
%YAML
directive
with
version
set
to
at
least
1.2
.
To
improve
readability
and
reduce
document
size,
the
document
MAY
use
a
%TAG
directive
appropriate
for
RDF
literals
contained
within
the
representation.
The
use
of
%TAG
directives
in
YAML-LD
is
similar
to
the
use
of
the
PREFIX
directive
in
[
Turtle
]
or
the
general
use
of
terms
as
prefixes
to
create
Compact
IRIs
in
[
JSON-LD11
]:
they
not
change
the
meaning
of
the
encoded
scalars.
%YAML 1.2
%TAG !xsd! http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema%23
---
"@context":
"@vocab": http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
name: !xsd!string Gregg Kellogg
homepage: https://greggkellogg.net/
depiction: http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/42f948...
date:
!xsd!date
"2022-08-08"
Although
allowed
within
the
YAML
Grammar,
some
current
YAML
parsers
do
not
allow
the
use
of
"#"
within
a
tag
URI.
Substituting
the
"%23"
escape
is
a
workaround
for
this
problem,
that
will
hopefully
become
unnecessary
as
implementations
are
updated.
A concrete proposal in that direction would be to use a tag at the top-level of any "idiomatic" YAML-LD document, applying to the whole object/array that makes the document.
It might also include a version to identify the specification that it relates to, allowing for version announcement that could be used for future-proofing.
The following block is one example:
!yaml-ld
$context: http://schema.org/
$type: Person
name
:
Pierre-Antoine
Champin
See
Example
7
14
for
an
example
of
serializing
the
extended
internal
representation.
This algorithm describes the steps to convert each element from the internal representation into corresponding YAML nodes by recursively processing each element n .
xsd:string
,
the
conversion
is
a
YAML
scalar
with
the
value
taken
from
that
value
of
n
.
https://www.w3.org/ns/i18n#
.
true
or
false
based
on
the
value
of
n
.
null
.
This section identifies two application profiles for operating with YAML-LD:
Application profiles allow publishers to use YAML-LD either for maximum interoperability, or for maximum expressivity. The YAML-LD JSON profile provides for complete round-tripping between YAML-LD documents and JSON-LD documents. The YAML-LD extended profile allows for fuller use of YAML features to enhance the ability to represent a larger number of native datatypes and reduce document redundancy.
Application
profiles
can
be
set
using
the
JsonLdProcessor
API
interface,
as
well
as
an
HTTP
request
profile
(see
A.
IANA
Considerations
).
The
YAML-LD
JSON
profile
is
based
on
the
YAML
Core
Schema
,
which
interprets
only
a
limited
set
of
node
tags
.
YAML
scalars
with
node
tags
outside
of
the
defined
range
SHOULD
be
avoided
and
MUST
be
converted
to
the
closest
scalar
type
from
the
YAML
Core
Schema
,
if
found.
See
5.5
D.1.5
Converting
a
YAML
scalar
for
specifics.
Keys used in a YAML mapping MUST be strings .
Although YAML-LD documents MAY include node anchors , documents MUST NOT use alias nodes .
A YAML stream MUST include only a single YAML document , as the JSON-LD internal representation only supports a single document model.
The YAML-LD extended profile extends the YAML Core Schema , allowing node tags to specify RDF literals by using a JSON-LD extended internal representation capable of directly representing RDF literals .
As with the YAML-LD JSON profile , YAML-LD documents in the YAML-LD extended profile MUST NOT use encodings other than UTF-8.
As with the YAML-LD JSON profile , keys used in a YAML mapping MUST be strings .
YAML-LD docucments MAY use alias nodes , as long as dereferencing these aliases does not result in a loop.
As with the YAML-LD JSON profile , a YAML stream MUST include only a single YAML document , as the JSON-LD extended internal representation only supports a single document model.
Consier
something
like
!id
as
a
local
tag
to
denote
IRIs.
This specification defines the JSON-LD extended internal representation , an extension of the JSON-LD internal representation .
In addition to maps , arrays , and strings , the internal representation allows native representation of numbers , boolean values, and nulls . The extended internal representation allows for native representation of RDF literals , both with a datatype IRI , and language-tagged strings .
When transforming from the extended internal representation to the internal representation — for example when serializing to JSON or to the YAML-LD JSON profile — implementations MUST transform RDF literals to the closest native representation of the internal representation :
xsd:boolean
are
transformed
to
either
true
or
false
,
xsd:decimal
,
xsd:double
,
xsd:float
,
or
derived
datatypes,
are
transformed
to
a
native
number
,
An alternative would be to transform such literals to JSON-LD value objects , and we may want to provide a means of transforming between the internal representation and extended internal representation using value objects , but this treatment is consistent with [ YAML ] Core Schema Tag Resolution .
This specification extends the JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API [ JSON-LD11-API ] Application Programming Interface and the JSON-LD 1.1 Framing [ JSON-LD11-FRAMING ] Application Programming Interface to manage the serialization and deserialization of [ YAML ] and to enable an option for setting the YAML-LD extended profile .
The
JSON-LD
Processor
interface
is
the
high-level
programming
structure
that
developers
use
to
access
the
JSON-LD
transformation
methods.
The
updates
below
is
an
experimental
extension
of
the
JsonLdProcessor
interface
defined
in
the
JSON-LD
1.1
API
[
JSON-LD11-API
]
to
serialize
output
as
YAML
rather
than
JSON.
compact
()
compact
()
algorithm
to
serialize
the
the
result
as
YAML
rather
than
JSON
as
defined
in
expand
()
expand
()
algorithm
to
serialize
the
the
result
as
YAML
rather
than
JSON
as
defined
in
flatten
()
flatten
()
algorithm
to
serialize
the
the
result
as
YAML
rather
than
JSON
as
defined
in
fromRdf
()
fromRdf
()
algorithm
to
serialize
the
the
result
as
YAML
rather
than
JSON
as
defined
in
Otherwise, if both theuseNativeTypes
andextendedYAML
flags are set and the datatype IRI of value is notxsd:string
:
- If value is a language-tagged string set converted value to a new RDF literal composed of the lexical form of value and datatype IRI composed of
https://www.w3.org/ns/i18n#
followed by the language tag of value .- Otherwise, et converted value to value .
toRdf
()
- Otherwise, if value is an RDF literal , value is left unmodified. This will only be the case when processing a value from an extended internal representation .
The
JsonLdOptions
type
is
used
to
pass
various
options
to
the
JsonLdProcessor
methods.
WebIDLpartial dictionary JsonLdOptions {
boolean extendedYAML
= false;
};
In addition to those options defined in the JSON-LD 1.1 API [ JSON-LD11-API ] and JSON-LD 1.1 Framing [ JSON-LD11-FRAMING ], this specification defines these additional options:
extendedYAML
xsd:string
or
language-tagged
strings
as
scalar
values.
documentLoader
,
it
causes
documents
of
type
application/ld+yaml
to
be
parsed
into
a
YAML
representation
graph
and
generates
an
internal
representation
(or
extended
internal
representation
):
This
section
describes
an
update
to
the
built-in
LoadDocumentCallback
to
load
YAML
streams
and
documents
into
the
internal
representation
,
or
into
the
extended
internal
representation
if
the
extendedYAML
API
flag
is
true
.
The
LoadDocumentCallback
algorithm
in
[
JSON-LD11-API
]
is
updated
as
follows:
application/ld+yaml
,
followed
by
application/yaml
,
followed
by
the
other
specified
Content-Types
.
application/yaml
or
any
media
type
with
a
+yaml
suffix
as
defined
in
[
RFC6839
]
transform
document
to
the
internal
representation
(or
extended
internal
representation
)
as
described
in
profile
parameter
includes
http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#extended
,
set
the
extendedYAML
option
to
true
.
These
updates
are
intended
to
be
compatible
with
other
updates
to
the
LoadDocumentCallback
,
such
as
Process
HTML
as
defined
in
[
JSON-LD11-API
].
The
YamlLdErrorCode
represents
the
collection
of
valid
YAML-LD
error
codes,
which
extends
the
JsonLdErrorCode
definitions.
WebIDLenum YamlLdErrorCode
{
"invalid-encoding
",
"mapping-key-error
",
"profile-error
"
};
invalid-encoding
mapping-key-error
profile-error
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
4.2 Comments
Comments in YAML-LD documents are treated as white space. This behavior is consistent with other Linked Data serializations such as [ TURTLE ]. See Interoperability considerations of [ I-D.ietf-httpapi-yaml-mediatypes ] for more details.